Public Agenda NewsPaperPublic Agenda NewsPaper
  • General News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Development Agenda
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions
  • Election watch
  • Editorial
Font ResizerAa
Public Agenda NewsPaperPublic Agenda NewsPaper
Font ResizerAa
  • General News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Development Agenda
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions
  • Election watch
  • Editorial
Search
  • General News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Development Agenda
  • World News
  • Features & Opinions
  • Election watch
  • Editorial
Follow US
Breaking NewsFeatures & Opinions

The Death Penalty; an inhumane and ineffective way to deal with serious crime

Latifa Carlos
Last updated: October 10, 2018 7:56 am
Latifa Carlos
Share
6 Min Read
Andrews Barnes
Andrews Barnes
SHARE

Today we join others around the world to mark the 16th World Day Against the Death Penalty.  The 2018 World Day is focused on raising awareness of the inhumane living conditions of people sentenced to death.

The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty reports that many testimonies document the inhumane living conditions that people sentenced to death endure.  Even though people on death row are entitled to the same basic rights and treatment conditions as other categories of prisoners, as set out in the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela rules).  In most countries around the world that still have prisoners on death row, the living conditions they endure are especially harsh and inhumane, adding to the mental stress of condemned prisoners.

In Australia, all six states and two territories had abolished the death penalty by 1985. In 2010, the federal government passed legislation that prohibited the reintroduction of capital punishment. The abolition of the death penalty in Australia has broad bipartisan political support.

More Read

Chinese mining firm targets Ewoyaa lithium takeover in $210m deal
Ghana now 8th biggest economy in Africa
Mahama, appointees donate GH¢6.1m to Mahama Cares Fund
Mawuedem Solution Supports Communities in Volta Region with Relief Items
Callistus Mahama warns against early succession talks, urges discipline and focus on governance

Reflecting Australia’s commitment to universal human rights, Australia believes as a matter of principle that the death penalty has no place in the modern world. It brutalises human society, is degrading, and is an affront to human dignity.

In particular, Australia opposes the death penalty because:  it is irrevocable – miscarriages of justice cannot be rectified, and no legal system is safe from error; it denies any possibility of rehabilitation to the convicted individual; there is no convincing evidence that it is a more effective deterrent than long-term or life imprisonment; and it is unfair – it is used disproportionately against the poor, people with intellectual or mental disabilities and minority groups.

The international trend is strongly in favour of global abolition – we want this to continue. Australia remains a leader in efforts to end use of the death penalty worldwide.

The key international legal instrument seeking to abolish the death penalty is the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1989. The protocol requires states parties to take all necessary measures to abolish the death penalty within their jurisdictions. Australia acceded to the Second Optional Protocol in 1990 and is one of more than 80 parties to the Protocol.  The Protocol entered into force in international law on 11 July 1991.

International momentum is towards the abolition of the death penalty.  In 1967, when Australia carried out its last execution, only 12 countries had completely abolished the death penalty; fifty years later, that number had risen to 107, with a further six countries abolitionist for ordinary (non-military) crimes.  (56 countries are retentionist and 23 countries carried out executions in 2017).  The pace at which abolition has spread globally has led some to argue that a customary norm is emerging that considers the death penalty to be a violation of the absolute prohibition on torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of punishment.

On 19 December 2007, Australia sponsored and voted in favour of a landmark United Nations General Assembly resolution which called for an immediate moratorium on executions as a first step towards the universal abolition of the death penalty.

As a member of the UN Human Rights Council for the 2018-20 term, Australia has pledged to continue its strong commitment to the global abolition of the death penalty.

Every second year, a resolution at the UN General Assembly calls for a global moratorium on the death penalty. Australia co-sponsors this resolution. In 2016, Australia joined the Inter-Regional Taskforce on the resolution, which initiates and negotiates the text. Australia undertakes lobbying in support of the resolution to secure strong and clear text and increased support for each successive resolution.

In alternate years to the General Assembly resolution, the Human Rights Council considers a resolution on the question of the death penalty. Australia co-sponsors this resolution.

Australia urges all countries that carry out capital punishment to cease executions and establish a moratorium on the use of the death penalty.  At the very least, we call for countries to reduce the scope or incidence of the application of the death penalty.  We particularly urge states not to impose the death penalty for offences which do not meet the threshold of ‘most serious crimes’ stipulated under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), including drug-related offences.

Australia condemns the imposition of the death penalty on juveniles, pregnant women and people with mental or intellectual disabilities and urges all countries that retain capital punishment as part of their law (whether or not they carry out executions) to remove references to the death penalty from legislation. Finally, Australia urges these countries to sign the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty.

 

By: Andrew Barnes, Australian High Commissioner to Ghana

Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Copy Link Print

Latest News

Ghana rises to 39th in Press Freedom Index amid structural challenges
May 6, 2026
Water Justice Network Pushes for Affordable, Inclusive Water Systems
May 4, 2026
Overall cost pressures in construction are easing – Government Statistician
April 30, 2026
Ghana can’t industrialise without power, water – Nii Moi Thompson
April 30, 2026
Ghana walks away from US health agreement over sensitive data concerns
April 28, 2026
Mali at risk of splintering after jihadi and separatist attacks
April 28, 2026
Create ‘water markets’ to fix Ghana’s supply challenges — Former GWL MD
April 28, 2026

You Might Also Like

Breaking NewsDevelopment Agendatop stories

National Water Justice Campaign Launched to Tackle Inequality in Access

April 21, 2026
Breaking NewsGeneral Newstop stories

ISODEC Urges Collective Action to Secure Safe Water for All Ghanaians

April 21, 2026
Breaking Newstop storiesWorld News

Man kills seven of his children, and an eighth child, in Louisiana mass shooting

April 20, 2026
Breaking NewsPan Africa Politicstop stories

A decade of African politics: democratic gains and new pressures

April 20, 2026

About Us

Public Agenda is fou­nded and owned by Pu­blic Agenda Communic­ations.

Public Agenda was founded as a public interest Me­dia entity. Its Visi­on is to contribute to building a well-i­nformed society where accurate informati­on dissemination is the cornerstone of a democratic, just and equitable society.

Its mission is to inform, guide and bui­ld responsible citiz­enship and accountab­le decision making and strive for excell­ence in the media in­dustry. Public Agenda Communications is managed by a Board of Directors.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?