The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has asked the government not to go to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for support.
Secretary-General of the TUC, Dr Yaw Baah said the IMF is not the solution to the challenges facing the country.
He told TV3’s Daniel Opoku in an interview on Wednesday, June 29 that Ghana has been to the Bretton Woods institution sixteen times but that has not solved the problems.
“We have advised the government not to go to the IMF because IMF has no solution for Ghana. The government has been to IMF 16 times for IMF programmes but we are where we are today. Therefore, that is not the solution, It is like saying this is not working but let us do more of it, it doesn’t make sense. We will be very surprised if the government goes to IMF,” he said.
The government has also been told to reduce spending and expand revenue generation in order to build a financial buffer to support the economy.
The managers of the economy must do this rather than nurturing an idea of returning to the IMF for support, an economist, David Yaw Mordey has said.
Dr Mordy explained that the government must strive to apply the Fiscal Policy Acta that was passed to check excess spending. This, he said is one of the major ways of ensuring fiscal discipline.
“The issue has to do with the fundamentals of our economy with respect to the exchange rate, Gross Domestic Product, inflation and then other indicators particularly inflation, and GDP is flourishing and we are within the range of 3.3 to 4 percent, inflation about 27 percent to 30 percent.
“So things are very hard in Ghana but that doesn’t mean that we should be opting for IMF. We know, IMF comes with a lot of conditionalities,the conditionalities are not favorable to the ordinary Ghanaian. So the IMF should not be part of the equation.
“We go to the IMF for policy credibility. If in 2020 you have overspent, the following year you try to scale it down. We have made the law, Fiscal Responsibility Act which mandates you to be within a certain threshold. All you have to do is to reduce your consumption expenditure and expand your capital investment, that is the only way we can address the fundamental issues in the economy,” he said on the 3FM Monday, June 27 after a leading member of the governing New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gabby Otchere Darko said in principle, he was not against the IMF programme.
Gabby explained that he is not for an IMF programme that gives the country peanuts but imposes conditions that will end up hurting the poor, jobs and businesses more.
In a series of tweets on Monday June 27, he said “Am I against an IMF program in principle? No”
“I am not for an IMF program that throws peanuts at us but imposes conditions that will end up hurting the poor, jobs, and businesses more. Covid-19 and War in Ukraine are not of Africa’s doing but more to our doom. A program that pretends it is all our doing is doomed to fail.”
“We do something that will inject confidence in our capacity to ride this heavy storm and that something should happen pretty quickly. Are you against an IMF program?”
Meanwhile, the Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta, recently insisted that Ghana would not go back to the IMF for support.
In his view, the government has put in place measures including salary cuts and others, and also programmes to deal with the fundamental issues affecting the economy.
Mr Ofori-Atta said these when he was asked by an expatriate journalist whether Ghana would consider going back to the IMF, at a press conference in Accra on Thursday, May 12.
He said while answering the question that “All the white folks are just interested in us coming in the IMF programme. I always wonder why.”
“We are members of the fund; there are two major points of interventions that we have from the fund. One is the advice that we get because of the phenomenal expertise that the fund has and then secondly, these programme interventions bring us some resources.
“I think, if you see from the budget that we constructed for 2022 and the subsequent announcement that we have done, clearly, the issue of Ghana having the capacity to think through the consolidation exercise exists. Also discipline itself with regards to the 20 percent, etc, that we have shown clearly.”
He further indicated that “We have committed to not going back to the fund because, in terms of the interventions and policy we are right there, the fund knows that we are completely in the right direction. The issue is, validating the programmes that we have put in place and then, in my view, supporting us to find alternative ways of financing or re-financing our debt, reprofiling it.”